Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00473
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Longwood Auto, LLC et al v. Torres et al
as 6:2023cv02158
Plaintiff:
Longwood Auto, LLC and Michael Morris
Defendant:
Gerardo Torres and CMG Auto and Tire Sales, LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
MORRIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv00429
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MORRIS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AERO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MORRIS v. AEARO LLC et al
as 3:2023cv19011
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MORRIS
Defendant:
AEARO LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MORRIS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv02148
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MORRIS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Aaron et al v. Bow Plumbing Group, Inc.
as 2:2023cv00060
Plaintiff:
Marcus Aaron, Charles Age, Mary Frances Age and others
Defendant:
Bow Plumbing Group Inc. and Bow Plumbing Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
MORRIS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv00763
Plaintiff:
ANDREW MICHAEL MORRIS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BURROUGHS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv14926
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MORRIS BURROUGHS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MORRIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv05600
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MORRIS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MORRIS v. CROWDER
as 5:2022cv00142
Petitioner:
MIMS MICHAEL MORRIS, JR
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL MATTHEW B CROWDER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
