Cases 1 - 10 of 58
MIERZWA v. ASHCROFT et al
as 2:2017cv02625
Plaintiff:
EDWARD J. MIERZWA
Defendant:
JOHN ASHCROFT, ALBERTO GONZALEZ, PAUL CLEMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ABULKHAIR v. BUSH et al
as 2:2011cv06616
Plaintiff:
ASSEM A. ABULKHAIR
Defendant:
GEORGE W. BUSH, MICHAEL MUKASEY, MICHAEL CHERTOFF and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674
THERTULIEN v. MUKASEY et al
as 2:2009cv02717
Petitioner:
ROBERTO THERTULIEN
Respondent:
MICHAEL MUKASEY, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, HQCDU and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
ROLAND v. MUKASEY et al
as 2:2009cv02388
Petitioner:
BEAUVOIR JEAN ROLAND
Respondent:
MICHAEL MUKASEY, MICHEAL CHERTOFF, ANDREA J. QUARANTILLO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BOLANOS v. AVILA et al
as 2:2009cv01208
Petitioner:
MARIA PACHECO BOLANOS
Respondent:
OSCAR AVILA, MICHAEL MUKASEY and HILLARY CLINTON
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
PIERRE v. MUKASEY et al
as 2:2009cv01169
Petitioner:
NORKENS PIERRE
Respondent:
MICHAEL MUKASEY, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, HQCDU and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00342
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
ANDERSON v. MCGUIRE et al
as 2:2009cv00340
Petitioner:
GARY PATRICK ANDERSON
Respondent:
LEO P. MCGUIRE, SCOTT WEBER, CHRISTOPHER SHANAHAN and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
ZAMAN et al v. COLLINS et al
as 2:2009cv00120
Petitioner:
MOHAMMAD ZAMAN and PATRICIA O'CONNOR
Respondent:
CHARLOTTE COLLINS, SCOTT WEBER, JOHN THOMPSON and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
DORILAS v. MUKASEY et al
as 2:2009cv00071
Petitioner:
CARLOS DORILAS
Respondent:
MICHAEL MUKASEY, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, HQCDU and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
