Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Alliance for Open Society Inte v. United States Agency for Inter
as 17-2126
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Open Society Institute, Pathfinder International. Inc., Global Health Council and others
Defendant - Appellant:
United States Agency for International Development, Andrew Natsios, in his Official Capacity as Administrator of the United States Agency for International Development, Julie Louise Gerberding, in her official capacity as Director of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and her successors and others
State of Connecticut et al v. USA et al
as 3:2009cv00054
Plaintiff:
State of Connecticut, State of Connecticut, State of Connecticut and others
Defendant:
USA, Health & Human Svc and Michael O. Leavitt
Movant:
State of New York, State of New York and Richard F. Daines
Intervenor Defendant:
Christian Medical Association, Christian Medical Association, Christian Medical Association and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Miles et al v. Leavitt
as 1:2008cv00432
Plaintiff:
Morganne Miles, Olivia Miles, Pascale Mossin and others
Defendant:
Michael O. Leavitt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Wong et al v. Smith et al
as 1:2007cv00879
Plaintiff:
Sai Kwan Wong, Sai Kwan Wong, Sai Kwan Wong and others
Defendant:
Robert Doar, Robert Doar, Richard F. Daines and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Alliance for Open Society International, Inc. et al v. United States Agency for International Development et al
as 1:2005cv08209
Plaintiff:
Alliance for Open Society International, Inc. , Open Society Institute , Pathfinder International and others
Defendant:
United States Agency for International Development , Julie Louise Gerberding , Michael O. Leavitt and others
Amicu:
AIDS Action et al. , Apne Aap et.al [Amicus] and InterAction
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
