Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Fuqua v. Thornell
as 3:2023cv08621
Petitioner:
Michael Ray Fuqua
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
State 48 Recycling Incorporated v. Janes et al
as 2:2022cv00767
Plaintiff:
State 48 Recycling Incorporated
Defendant:
Michael Ray Janes, Unknown Janes, Angel J Alva and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Fuqua #215717 v. Unknown Party
as 3:2022cv08018
Petitioner:
Michael Ray Fuqua
Respondent:
David Shinn, Unknown Party and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kapp v. USA
as 2:2021cv01470
Petitioner:
Michael Ray Kapp
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Fuqua #215717 v. Raak et al
as 2:2018cv02337
Defendant:
Unknown Horn, Unknown Troman, Unknown Gonzelez and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Ray Fuqua
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fuqua #215717 v. Raak et al
as 2:2018cv01379
Plaintiff:
Michael Ray Fuqua
Defendant:
Unknown Raak, D Webster, Unknown Higuera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lynam v. Ryan et al
as 4:2015cv00488
Petitioner:
Michael Ray Lynam
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ray v. Prudential Insurance Company of America et al
as 2:2015cv01567
Plaintiff:
Robert Michael Ray
Defendant:
Prudential Insurance Company of America , SuperMedia Incorporated and SuperMedia Incorporated Long Term Disability Insurance Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Fuqua #215717 v. Moody et al
as 2:2015cv01298
Plaintiff:
Michael Ray Fuqua
Defendant:
Chris Moody, Charles L Ryan, Unknown Twyford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fuqua v. Ryan et al
as 2:2015cv00286
Plaintiff:
Michael Ray Fuqua
Defendant:
Unknown Cambit, Unknown Fransicco, Unknown Sterns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
