Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Mullett v. Lilly et al
as 4:2023cv01270
Petitioner:
Michael Robert Mullett
Respondent:
Veronical Lilly, V. Libby and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Roberts v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv04553
Petitioner:
Scott Michael Roberts
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Saturn v. Austin Bergstrom International Airport et al
as 1:2020cv01176
Defendant:
Dell Medical Center at UT System, Washington Mutual Bank, City of Austin and others
Plaintiff:
Johnny Saturn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
LaMothe v. Moran et al
as 4:2020cv00229
Defendant:
Alan Jacobs, David Bennett, Eduardo Espinosa and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Robert LaMothe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00938
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Yet Classified:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Mallett v. Allred Medical Staff
as 3:2019cv01285
Defendant:
Allred Medical Staff
Plaintiff:
Michael Robert Mallett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baskett et al v. Rhone et al
as 3:2019cv00001
Plaintiff:
John Stephen Baskett and Michael Robert Baskett
Defendant:
Carolyn Sue Rhone and Andrea Nicole Rhone Chambers
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv04218
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Mitchell v. Eavenson et al
as 3:2017cv03473
Plaintiff:
Tony Ray Mitchell
Defendant:
Harold Eavenson , Sarah Engelhardt , Justin Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ballesteros v. USA
as 2:2017cv00037
Petitioner:
Michael Robert Ballesteros
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
