Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Michael Gorbey v. Captain Avery, et al
as 22-2405
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL S. GORBEY
Defendant / Appellee:
CAPTAIN AVERY, COUNSELOR GRAHAM, WARDEN, USP THOMSON and others
Michael Gorbey v. USP Thomson
as 22-2129
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL S. GORBEY
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES PENITENTIARY - THOMSON
Michael Gorbey v. District of Columbia, Washingt, et al
as 09-2810
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL S. GORBEY
Defendant - Appellee:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, WASHINGTON D.C., PETER NICKLES, Attorney General, District of Columbia, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS and others
Michael Gorbey v. Helen Marberry
as 09-2729
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL S. GORBEY
Respondent - Appellee:
HELEN J. MARBERRY
GORBEY v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, WASHINGTON D.C. et al
as 2:2009cv00156
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL S GORBEY
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, WASHINGTON D.C., PETER NICKLES, COURT OF APPEALS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GORBEY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2009cv00154
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL S GORBEY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, OFFICE OF THE CLERK, U.S. SUPREME COURT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GORBEY v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 2:2009cv00151
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL S GORBEY
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, PETER NICKLES, CLERKS OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GORBEY v. THE STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA et al
as 2:2009cv00137
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL S. GORBEY
Defendant:
THE STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, MONONGALIA COUNTY, SHERIFF'S OFFICE OF MONONGALIA COUNTY and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
GORBEY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2009cv00096
Petitioner:
MICHAEL S. GORBEY
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
