Cases 31 - 40 of 43
Michael Gorbey v. Harold Clarke
as 13-6973
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL S. GORBEY
Respondent - Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections
Gorbey v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al - DO NOT FILE IN THIS CASE. FILE IN CASE 2:12cv667
as 2:2013cv00102
Petitioner:
Michael S. Gorbey
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Virginia and Federal Bureau Of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gorbey v. Warden of the Federal Transfer Center et al
as 5:2013cv00053
Petitioner:
Michael S Gorbey
Respondent:
Warden of the Federal Transfer Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Gorbey v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 2:2012cv00667
Petitioner:
Michael S. Gorbey
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gorbey v. Warden at the Oklahoma City Transfer Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
as 5:2012cv01331
Petitioner:
Michael S Gorbey
Respondent:
Warden of the Federal Transfer Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Michael Gorbey v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Med
as 12-15658
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL S. GORBEY
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN
Gorbey v. Billingsley
as 1:2012cv05662
Petitioner:
Michael S. Gorbey
Respondent:
Billingsley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gorbey v. Billingsley
as 1:2012cv04578
Petitioner:
Michael S. Gorbey
Respondent:
Warden Billingsley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gorbey v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Medium
as 5:2010cv00660
Petitioner:
Michael S. Gorbey
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Medium
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gorbey v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Medium
as 5:2010cv00308
Petitioner:
Michael S. Gorbey
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Medium
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
