Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Wilson v. USA
as 3:2022cv00479
Petitioner:
Michael Wilson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Wilson v. Caremark Pharmacy, LLC
as 1:2016cv00883
Plaintiff:
Robert Michael Wilson
Defendant:
Caremark Pharmacy, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ABDEL-AZIZ v. GREYHOUND LINES, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv06783
Plaintiff:
MUSTAFA ABDEL-AZIZ
Defendant:
GREYHOUND LINES, INC. and MICHAEL WILSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WILSON v. VAUGHN et al
as 2:2013cv07268
Petitioner:
MICHAEL WILSON
Respondent:
DONALD T. VAUGHN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR PHILADELPHIA COUNTY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WILSON et al v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC
as 2:2012cv00400
Plaintiff:
DORIS M. WILSON , MARISSA WILSON and MICHAEL WILSON
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MCGRATH v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2011cv05761
Plaintiff:
BARBARA MCGRATH
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, MICHAEL WILSON and CURRENTLY UNAMED AND UNKNOWN CITY OF PHILADELPHIA POLICE OFFICERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILSON v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE HOLDINGS (AMERICAS) INC.
as 2:2010cv06419
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL WILSON
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE HOLDINGS (AMERICAS) INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
JOHNSON v. KRAJEWSKI et al
as 2:2010cv01704
Plaintiff:
AQUIL STEFON JOHNSON
Defendant:
JAREK KRAJEWSKI, BRUCH JEFFREY, JENNIFER MITRICH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILSON et al v. CELOTEX CORP. et al
as 2:2008cv87882
Plaintiff:
EUNICE WILSON, EUNICE WILSON, MICHAEL WILSON and others
Defendant:
CELOTEX CORP., NATIONAL GYPSUM CO., GAF CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
