Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Wright et al v. Vilsack et al
as 2:2024cv02155
Plaintiff:
Michael Wright, Casey Wright and Josh Wright
Defendant:
Thomas Vilsack, Michael Watson, U.S. Department of Agriculture and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Wright et al v. Vilsack et al
as 2:2024cv02156
Plaintiff:
Josh Wright, Casey Wright and Michael Wright
Defendant:
Thomas Vilsack, Michael Watson, U.S. Department of Agriculture and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Freeman v. Wright-Freeman
as 2:2023cv13271
Defendant:
Michael Wright-Freeman, Michael Wright, Brian Rasheen Washington and others
Plaintiff:
L. Gabrielle Freeman
Hunter et al v. FCA US LLC et al
as 2:2019cv10345
Plaintiff:
Paula Wheeler, John Purcell, Clarence M. Titlow and others
Defendant:
Robert Bosch, LLC, VM Motori S.p.A., Robert Bosch GmbH and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv02404
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01975
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01974
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Lidochem, Inc., et al v. Stoller Enterprises, Inc., et al
as 10-1686
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LIDOCHEM, INC., a New Jersey Corporation and FRANK DEAN
Defendant - Appellee:
STOLLER ENTERPRISES, INC., a Texas Corporation, JERRY STOLLER, MICHAEL WRIGHT and others
Lidochem, Inc. et al v. Stoller Enterprises Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv00204
Plaintiff:
Lidochem, Inc. and Frank Dean
Defendant:
Stoller Enterprises Inc., Jerry Stoller, Michael Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
