Cases 1 - 10 of 107
JENKINS v. CENTURION HEALTH et al
as 1:2024cv00591
Plaintiff:
ALAN W. JENKINS
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH, MERSHON, REAGLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McKinley Kelly v. Michael Mitcheff, et al
as 24-1157
Plaintiff:
MCKINLEY KELLY
Defendant:
MICHAEL MITCHEFF, Doctor, SAMUEL BYRD, NAVEEN RAJOLI and others
Charles Justise, Sr. v. Michael Mitcheff
as 23-2735
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES E. JUSTISE, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL MITCHEFF, Doctor
ALLEN v. CENTURION HEALTH SERVICE LLC et al
as 1:2023cv01442
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK ALLEN
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH SERVICE LLC, MARK SEVIER, MICHAEL MITCHEFF and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniel Crone v. Bruce Ippel, et al
as 23-1387
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL CRONE
Defendant / Appellee:
BRUCE IPPEL, Doctor, WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC, MICHAEL MITCHEFF, Doctor and others
ROUZIER v. JAFFE et al
as 1:2022cv02302
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL ROUZIER
Defendant:
B. JAFFE, CORIZON, ALFA FINOTE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas Tracy v. Wexford of Indiana, LLC, et al
as 22-2943
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS DUANE TRACY
Defendant / Appellee:
WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC, PAUL A. TALBOT, Doctor, MICHAEL MITCHEFF, Doctor and others
JOHNSON v. WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv00468
Plaintiff:
BRIAN JOHNSON
Defendant:
WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC, WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC, SAMUEL BYRD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jerry Wright v. Wexford of Indiana, LLC, et al
as 22-2555
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JERRY WRIGHT
Defendant / Appellee:
WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC and MICHAEL MITCHEFF, Doctor
Marcus v. Kuiper et al
as 3:2022cv00705
Plaintiff:
Matthew Marcus, II
Defendant:
Joshua Kuiper, James Jackson, Wexford of Indiana LLC and others
Not Classified By Court:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
