Cases 21 - 30 of 109
KELLY v. CORIZON, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv01404
Petitioner:
MCKINLEY KELLY
Respondent:
DR. JACKIE WEST-DENNING, KIM HOBSON, DR. NAVEEN RAJOLI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DIXON v. SEVIER et al
as 1:2021cv01089
Plaintiff:
CORDAY DIXON
Defendant:
J. KENEKHAM, FISHER, M. SEVIER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Christopher Johnson v. Sheri Wilson, et al
as 21-1709
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL MITCHEFF, Doctor, RACHEL HOUGHTON, Nurse Practitioner, individual and in their official capacity, DUAN PIERCE, Doctor and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER M. JOHNSON
HUSPON v. MITCHEFF et al
as 2:2021cv00183
Defendant:
WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC, MICHAEL MITCHEFF and MARTIAL KNIESER
Plaintiff:
T. HUSPON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES et al
as 1:2021cv00804
Defendant:
ROJOLIC, ROBERT CARTER, SCHILLING and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN E. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ADAMS v. WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC. et al
as 1:2021cv00761
Defendant:
LAURA BODKIN, DUSHAN ZATECKY, PAUL A. TALBOT and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES WAYNE ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marcus v. Kuiper et al
as 3:2021cv00088
Defendant:
Joshua Kuiper, Wexford of Indiana LLC, Michael Mitcheff and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Marcus, II
Not Classified By Court:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROUZIER v. WEXFORD MEDICAL SOURCE et al
as 2:2021cv00072
Defendant:
CHERYL PETTY, JANE DOE, DUSHAN ZATECKY and others
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL ROUZIER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CRONE v. IPPEL et al
as 1:2021cv00232
Defendant:
CORIZON, LLC, D. JOHNSON, MICHAEL MITCHEFF and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL CRONE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HANDLEY v. WEXFORD MEDICAL SERVICES et al
as 2:2021cv00058
Defendant:
WEXFORD MEDICAL SERVICES, DUAN PEARCE, MICHAEL MITCHEFF and others
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO HANDLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
