Cases 1 - 10 of 7,314
GA Medlock Bridge LLC v. Ziko
as 1:2024cv02199
Plaintiff:
GA Medlock Bridge LLC
Defendant:
Michael Ziko
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
Dyer v. Unnamed Defendant(s)
as 2:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
Michael David Dyer
Defendant:
Unnamed Defendant(s)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CLEGG v. WALTON COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, et al
as 3:2024cv00039
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL WAYNE CLEGG
Defendant:
WALTON COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE and CORRECTHEALTH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cobble et al v. Biden et al
as 1:2024cv02044
Plaintiff:
David Cobble and American Citizens
Defendant:
Joseph R. Biden, Jr., Brad Raffensperger, Alexander Soros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fields v. Gwinnett County Police et al
as 1:2024cv02067
Plaintiff:
Kirk Michael Fields
Defendant:
Gwinnett County Police, Officer Bishop, Officer Stewart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RUSSELL v. MILLER HARDWARE COMPANY LLC
as 7:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SEAN RUSSELL
Defendant:
MILLER HARDWARE COMPANY, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02042
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Antonetti v. Activision Blizzard, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02019
Defendant:
Rockstar Games UK Limited, Activision Blizzard, Inc., Infinity Ward, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Antonetti
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lay v. Unknown
as 4:2024cv00121
Petitioner:
Michael Antonio Lay
Respondent:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lay v. Unknown
as 1:2024cv02005
Petitioner:
Michael Antonio Lay
Respondent:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
