Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Weston v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 3:2024cv08084
Plaintiff:
Michelle L Weston
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Johnson v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 2:2023cv01123
Plaintiff:
Michelle L Johnson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Ardoin v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 2:2022cv01358
Plaintiff:
Michelle L Ardoin
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Dorsey v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv01366
Plaintiff:
Michele L Dorsey
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ader v. Colvin
as 2:2016cv03854
Plaintiff:
Michelle L Ader
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Grant et al v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2016cv00899
Plaintiff:
Michelle L Grant and Steve Brown
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hoffman v. Colvin
as 2:2016cv00478
Plaintiff:
Michelle L Hoffman
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Parker v. Maximum Title Loans LLC
as 2:2014cv01828
Plaintiff:
Michelle L Parker
Defendant:
Maximum Title Loans LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
McHugh v. Pima, County of et al
as 4:2014cv01992
Plaintiff:
Michael McHugh
Defendant:
Pima, County of , Pima County Sheriff's Department, Clarence Dupnik and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McHugh v. Pima, County of et al
as 4:2013cv00590
Plaintiff:
Michael McHugh
Defendant:
Pima, County of , Pima County Sheriff's Department , Clarence W Dupnik and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
