Cases 1 - 7 of 7
HERNANDEZ SANTIAGO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv94191
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL ANGEL HERNANDEZ SANTIAGO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Miguel Hernandez-Abraham v. USA
as 18-11162
Petitioner - Appellant:
MIGUEL ANGEL HERNANDEZ-ABRAHAM
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Hernandez-Abraham v. United States Of America
as 9:2016cv81187
Plaintiff:
Miguel Angel Hernandez-Abraham
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
USA v. Miguel Hernandez-Abraham
as 13-11932
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MIGUEL ANGEL HERNANDEZ-ABRAHAN, a.k.a. Miguel Hernandez
Morales-Arcadio et al v. Shannon Jr. et al
as 6:2012cv00117
Plaintiff:
Clemente Morales-Arcadio , Jose Rosalino Antonio-Candelaria , Juan Carlos Flores-Medina and others
Defendant:
James G. Shannon, Jr., James G. Shannon, Sr., Cynthia Shannon and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Flores-Medina et al v. Shannon Produce Farms, Inc. et al
as 6:2012cv00083
Plaintiff:
Juan Carlos Flores-Medina , Roque Sanchez-Melchor , Demetrio Santos-Cruz and others
Defendant:
Shannon Produce Farms, Inc. , James G. Shannon, Sr. , James G. Shannon, Jr. and others
Third_party_plaintiff:
Clemente Morales-Arcadio
Third_party_defendant:
James G. Shannon, Jr. , Pattie Martinez, Shannon Vineyards, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Laboy et al v. Florida Department of Children and Family Services et al
as 2:2007cv14071
Plaintiff:
Jessica Laboy, Miguel Angel Hernandez, Jr and Cynthia Guadalupe Robles
Defendant:
Florida Department of Children and Family Services, Florida Department of Children and Family Services, Florida Department of Children and Family Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
