Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Aguirre v. Sessions et al
as 4:2018cv01006
Plaintiff:
Miguel Cruz Aguirre
Defendant:
Jefferson Sessions, Kirstjen Nielsen, Mark Siegl and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Cruz-Madrigal v. USA
as 5:2016cv00147
Petitioner:
Miguel Cruz-Madrigal
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Leger v. M.E.S.E. Fish Grill Inc., individually and doing business as M E S E Fish City Grill Inc. and Cabo Grill Houston et al
as 4:2015cv00917
Plaintiff:
Daniel Princeton Leger
Defendant:
M.E.S.E. Fish Grill Inc. and Miguel Cruz
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Hernandez et al v. Group of Office Installers Inc et al
as 3:2012cv00830
Plaintiff:
Carlos Eduardo Hernandez and Jose Martinez-Puerto
Defendant:
Group of Office Installers Inc, Miguel Cruz, Rocio M. Cruz and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00185
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv01743
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2008cv00055
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Ramirez v. Potter et al
as 7:2008cv00011
Plaintiff:
Delma Ramirez
Defendant:
John E. Potter, Israel Carrasco, Ismael Hinojos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Carrillo et al v. Reichhold, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv00128
Plaintiff:
Sotero Carrillo, Jose Carmen Carrillo, Felix Carrillo and others
Defendant:
Reichhold, Inc., Reichhold, Inc., Underground Resource Management, Inc. and others
Intervenor:
Zurich American Insurance Co. and Zurich American Insurance Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
