Cases 1 - 10 of 55
ADAMS v. BUCKS COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 2:2023cv02142
Plaintiff:
ROBERT L. ADAMS, JR.
Defendant:
BUCKS COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, SUPERINTENDENT METELLUS, KELLY REED and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
H.C. et al v. Chudzik et al
as 5:2022cv01588
Plaintiff:
H.C., R.H., C.B. and others
Defendant:
Hon. Brian Chudzik, Hon. Edwin Tobin, Hon. Miles Bixler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cooke v. Oberlander et al
as 3:2022cv00022
Petitioner:
Miles Cooke
Respondent:
Derrick E Oberlander, District Attorney of Dauphin County and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SIMMONS v. GIANETTA et al
as 2:2021cv04962
Petitioner:
JOSEPH SIMMONS
Respondent:
NANCY GIANETTA, C/O PETERS, C/O COLLIER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES et al v. COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY et al
as 2:2021cv01094
Plaintiff:
CARL S. JONES, JR., ANTHONY LEE, CHARLES LANTZY and others
Defendant:
COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY and WARDEN ORLANDO L. HARPER
Petitioner:
CODY SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
MILES v. CURRY et al
as 2:2021cv03257
Plaintiff:
ROMANUS MILES
Respondent:
W. CURRY, NANCY GIANETTO, BLANCHE D. CARNEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SWEET v. MILES et al
as 2:2021cv02885
Plaintiff:
SHAYNE SWEET
Defendant:
SERGEANT MILES and C/O BLAIRE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BULLARD v. CARNEY et al
as 2:2021cv01590
Defendant:
MOORE, SGT. MILES, SGT. D. THOMAS LARSON and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES FOY BULLARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRYANT v. RADDAD
as 2:2021cv01116
Plaintiff:
EMMANUEL BRYANT
Defendant:
RADDAD, HANDY, KILSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOORE v. CORRECTIONAL OFFICER ROSA et al
as 2:2021cv00933
Defendant:
MICHELLE FERRELL, JOHN DOE, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER SGT. MILES and others
Plaintiff:
NAIEEM MOORE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
