Cases 1 - 10 of 164
Miles v. Hamm et al
as 2:2024cv00149
Plaintiff:
Vernus Miles
Defendant:
John Q. Hamm and Chadwick Crabtree
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
M. et al v. Azar et al
as 2:2024cv00102
Plaintiff:
Michaela M., Gabriel M., Kinley G. and others
Defendant:
Stephanie M. Azar and Jean W. Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Keys v. Miles College
as 2:2024cv00110
Plaintiff:
Kevin Keys
Defendant:
Miles College
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Heard v. Miles et al
as 7:2023cv01424
Plaintiff:
Decarla Raietta Heard
Defendant:
Darius Miles, Michael Davis and Brandon Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Wrongful Death
Miles v. Kijakazi
as 3:2023cv00601
Plaintiff:
Lisa Miles
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Bey v. Miles et al
as 1:2023cv00314
Plaintiff:
Tevin Akan Bey
Defendant:
Roderick Miles, Mobile Police Department, Mobile Police Department Impound and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Miles v. Moore et al
as 2:2023cv00733
Plaintiff:
Veronica P. Miles and Veronica P Miles
Defendant:
Robert J Moore and Estes Express Lines Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Auto Negligence
Harper et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv00669
Plaintiff:
Carl J Harper, Leon Guy Patterson, Sr, Wayne Earl Paul and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Amercas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Watkins et al v. Gill et al
as 1:2023cv00186
Plaintiff:
Marc Watkins and Randi Watkins
Defendant:
James D. Gill, Jr. and Chad Miles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Miles v. Morgan
as 2:2023cv00446
Plaintiff:
James Edward Miles
Defendant:
Vanessa Lashawn Morgan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Auto Negligence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
