Cases 1 - 10 of 3,944
Miller v. Alegro Trading, LLC
as 1:2024cv21932
Plaintiff:
William Miller
Defendant:
Alegro Trading, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0501 Copyright Infringement
Miller v. State Farm Mutual Auto Insurance Company
as 6:2024cv00917
Plaintiff:
Lisa Miller
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Auto Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Miller v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2024cv01093
Plaintiff:
Ronald Richard Miller
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Vega v. Paramore et al
as 5:2024cv00239
Plaintiff:
Luis Ordonez Vega
Defendant:
Waiter H. Paramore, Jeremy Barrett Smith, Michael Bornstein and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Cleveland v. Prendergast et al
as 5:2024cv00224
Plaintiff:
Alginavon Teriano Cleveland
Defendant:
Michael Prendergast, David Miller, Evan Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00790
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Eglaus, Assony v. Captain Lyons et al
as 2:2024cv14109
Plaintiff:
Assony Eglaus
Defendant:
Captain Lyons, Sergeant Phillips, Deputy Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
McCoy v. Flowers et al
as 6:2024cv00698
Plaintiff:
Idecheac A. McCoy
Defendant:
Mark Flowers, Deputy Nelson, Deputy Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS v. MILLER et al
as 4:2024cv00162
Plaintiff:
MARIO M THOMAS
Defendant:
JAMES WILLIAM MILLER, SHAWN SWAIN and DAWN A HART
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MILLER v. DIXON
as 1:2024cv00057
Petitioner:
MICHAEL DEVON MILLER
Respondent:
RICKY D DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
