Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Carpenter, Administrator of the Estate of Daniel N. Grimes v. Secretary of Housing and Urban Development et al
as 2:2023cv03885
Plaintiff:
Patrick Carpenter, Administrator of the Estate of Daniel N. Grimes
Defendant:
Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, Thelma Galloway, Thelma Kay Coble and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure
Miller v. C.R. Bard Inc et al
as 2:2022cv01816
Plaintiff:
Melinda Miller
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Miller v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv04707
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Newton Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Miller v. Monsanto Company
as 5:2019cv02128
Plaintiff:
Robert Miller
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Miller v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv00347
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Meghan Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Herman et al v. O'Keefe et al
as 2:2017cv01011
Plaintiff:
O'Keefe-Miller, LLC and Sandra J. Herman
Defendant:
Karen A. Sturgeon and Brendan O'Keefe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sullen v. Bray et al
as 1:2017cv01499
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Sullen
Defendant:
Jay Bray , Nationstar Mortgage LLC , Richard Severin Fuld, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Miller et al v. US Bank, NA et al
as 3:2017cv00055
Plaintiff:
William R Miller and Stacy A Miller
Defendant:
US Bank, NA and US Bank Home Mortgage
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
v. Miller et al
as 3:2017oe00053
Defendant:
William R Miller, Stacy A Miller and US Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rover Pipeline LLC v. Bartter et al
as 5:2017cv00239
Defendant:
Bartter, Dominion Resources, Inc., NiSource Corporate Services Company and others
Plaintiff:
Rover Pipeline LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
