Cases 1 - 10 of 18
BARTH v. WATERBORO et al
as 2:2023cv00295
Defendant:
MARILYN MILLER, TOWN OF WATERBORO, GARY LAMB and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN S BARTH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MCBREAIRTY v. MILLER et al
as 1:2023cv00143
Plaintiff:
SHAWN MCBREAIRTY
Defendant:
HEATH MILLER and SCHOOL BOARD OF RSU22
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DAVIS et al v. THERIAULT et al
as 1:2022cv00275
Plaintiff:
HAROLD JOHN DAVIS, JR and CRAIG WORSTER
Defendant:
JANET THERIAULT, STEVEN GOLIEB, MICHAEL MADORE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MCBREAIRTY v. SCHOOL BOARD OF RSU22 et al
as 1:2022cv00206
Plaintiff:
SHAWN MCBREAIRTY
Defendant:
SCHOOL BOARD OF RSU22 and HEATH MILLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WEAVER v. LIVERMORE, TOWN OF et al
as 2:2021cv00266
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL WEAVER
Defendant:
TOWN OF LIVERMORE, AMY BYRON, AARON MILLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLARK v. ELLSWORTH SCHOOL BOARD et al
as 1:2021cv00250
Plaintiff:
GWENDOLYN J CLARK
Defendant:
ELLSWORTH SCHOOL BOARD and ABIGAIL T MILLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00113
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DIMOULAS et al v. USA et al
as 1:2019cv00536
Defendant:
JOHN SCHATTINGER, PRINCIPAL, DAVID WALKER, SUPERINTENDENT, MOUNT VERNON POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Plaintiff:
ATHANASIOS DIMOULAS, THELSIA DIMOULAS and ANTONIOS DIMOULAS
Not Yet Classified:
MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - NON PRISONER IFP CASES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MERRILL v. STATE OF MAINE et al
as 2:2019cv00391
Defendant:
STATE OF MAINE, MAINE STATE POLICE COMPUTER CRIMES UNIT, GLENN LANG and others
Plaintiff:
MARC L MERRILL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00033
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
