Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Sullivan v. U.S. Customs and Border Protection et al
as 3:2021cv01406
Plaintiff:
Rodney Jeffery Sullivan
Defendant:
U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Troy A. Miller and The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0983
United States of America v. $70,000 in U.S. Currency et al
as 3:2012cv00994
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$70,000 in U.S. Currency, Twenty Blank Western Union Money Orders and Two Money Gram Orders Valued at $11,800, Twenty-One Western Union Money Orders Valued at $10,175 and others
Claimant:
Brian James Miller
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. Real Property Located at 11786 Miller Peak Road, Oroville, California
as 2:2009cv02547
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Real Property Located at 11786 Miller Peak Road, Oroville, California
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property - Real Estate
United States of America v. Real Property Located at 11786 Miller Peak Road, Oroville, California
as 2:2009at01467
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Real Property Located at 11786 Miller Peak Road, Oroville, California
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property - Real Estate
Steve Bentley, et al v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Fi, et al
as 09-16111
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVE BENTLEY, a single man and THOMAS RAY BENTLEY, a married man
Defendant - Appellee:
BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO, FIREARMS, AND EXPLOSIVES, a principal law enforcement agency within the United States Department of Justice, GENEVA MILLER DUNAWAY, Special Agent in Charge for Asset Forfeiture and Seized Property Branch of ATF and TERRY P. BESTA, Special Agent for ATF
Bentley et al v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives et al
as 2:2008cv01796
Plaintiff:
Steve Bentley and Thomas Ray Bentley
Defendant:
Terry P Besta, Geneva Miller Dunaway and Bureau of Alcohol, Tabbaco, Firearms, and Explosives
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
