Cases 21 - 30 of 252
Cloud v. Kansas, State of et al
as 5:2022cv03210
Plaintiff:
Sharon Cloud
Defendant:
Kansas, State of, Richard N. Raleigh, Mandi Stephenson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Erwin (ID 123078) v. Zmuda et al
as 5:2022cv03170
Plaintiff:
Christopher Adam Erwin
Defendant:
Jeff Zmuda, Libby Keogh, Darcie Holthous and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02279
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Cloud v. Kansas, State of et al
as 5:2022cv03146
Plaintiff:
Sharon Cloud
Defendant:
Kansas, State of, Mandi Stephenson, Richard N. Raleigh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Dollar General Corporation et al
as 6:2022cv01137
Plaintiff:
Joyce Miller
Defendant:
Dollar General Corporation and DG Retail LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Miller v. Traders Insurance Company
as 2:2022cv02177
Plaintiff:
Brenda Miller
Defendant:
Traders Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Howard v. Miller et al
as 5:2022cv03073
Plaintiff:
Michael Joseph Howard
Defendant:
T. Miller, (fnu) Sutton, (fnu) Wallace and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02075
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
McGregor v. Neodesha, Kansas, City of et al
as 6:2022cv01033
Plaintiff:
Lori McGregor
Defendant:
Neodesha, Kansas, City of, Casey's General Stores, Casey's General Store and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Anderson v. Tuxhorn et al
as 5:2022cv03018
Plaintiff:
Tommy Leroy Anderson
Defendant:
E. Tuxhorn, D. Robison, Leu Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
