Cases 11 - 20 of 462
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00281
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1182 Immigration & Nationality Act of 1990
Green v. Miller
as 2:2024cv00287
Petitioner:
Michael Green
Respondent:
Jamie Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00248
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Walton v. Miller
as 2:2024cv00174
Petitioner:
Tyrone Earl Walton
Respondent:
J. Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barton v. Bower et al
as 6:2024cv00140
Plaintiff:
Dale Alan Barton
Defendant:
Andrew L. Bower, MD, Michelle Davies, Warren Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00031
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1182 Immigration & Nationality Act of 1990
Hale v. Fhuere et al
as 2:2023cv01984
Plaintiff:
Harlan James Hale
Defendant:
Corey Fhuere, Dr. B.T. Smith, K. Ross and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. State of Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2023cv01850
Plaintiff:
Michael Miller
Defendant:
State of Oregon, Department of Corrections dba Snake River Correctional Institution, Niecha L. Butcher and State of Oregon Department of Corrections An Oregon Public Body doing business as Snake River Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv01844
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Sanchez-Diaz v. Miller
as 2:2023cv01725
Petitioner:
Efrain Sanchez-Diaz
Respondent:
Jamie Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
