Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv06458
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02242
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00792
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 5 U.S.C. § 706 Administrative Procedures Act(Judicial Review)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2023cv03225
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00243
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Incorrectly Filed
as 4:2023cv00242
Plaintiff:
Thi Thanh Ngoc Doan, Duc Hinh Pham, Minh Hieu Pham and others
Defendant:
Vuong Ba Do, Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, Attorney General Merrick Garland and others
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
PHAM v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv99418
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MINH-DUC PHAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pham v. United States of America
as 1:2019cv02389
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Minh Quang Pham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Pham v. United States of America
as 1:2018cv07974
Plaintiff:
Minh Quang Pham
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Minh Pham v. Greenpoint Mortgage Funding, I, et al
as 13-12879
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MINH A. PHAM
Defendant - Appellee:
GREENPOINT MORTGAGE FUNDING, INC., BANK OF AMERICA, NA, JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, NA and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
