Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 37
The Travelers Indemnity Company of America v. Pro Electric LC et al
as 6:2024cv03083
Plaintiff: The Travelers Indemnity Company of America
Defendant: Pro Electric LC, Missouri State University and Carson-Mitchell Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Type: Contract Insurance
Curtis Vaughn v. Sean Flannery, et al
as 23-2962
Plaintiff / Appellant: Curtis Dwayne Vaughn
Defendant / Appellee: Sean M. Flannery, Administrator, Information Technology Support, Department of Computer Services, Missouri State University, IT Department of Computer Services, Missouri State University and Missouri State University
Curtis Vaughn v. Sean Flannery, et al
as 23-1772
Plaintiff / Appellant: Curtis Dwayne Vaughn
Defendant / Appellee: Sean M. Flannery, Administrator, Information Technology Support, Department of Computer Services, Missouri State University, IT Department of Computer Services, Missouri State University and Missouri State University
Curtis Vaughn v. Sean Flannery, et al
as 23-1675
Plaintiff / Appellant: Curtis Dwayne Vaughn
Defendant / Appellee: Sean M. Flannery, Administrator, Information Technology Support, Department of Computer Services, Missouri State University, IT Department of Computer Services, Missouri State University and Missouri State University
Curtis Vaughn v. Sean Flannery, et al
as 23-1281
Plaintiff / Appellant: Curtis Dwayne Vaughn
Defendant / Appellee: Sean M. Flannery, Administrator, Information Technology Support, Department of Computer Services, Missouri State University, IT Department of Computer Services, Missouri State University and Missouri State University
Vaughn v. Flannery et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2022cv03301
Plaintiff: Curtis Dwayne Vaughn
Defendant: Sean M. Flannery, IT Department of Computer Services and Missouri State University
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Richard Hershey v. Dr. John Jasinski, et al
as 22-2236
Plaintiff / Appellee: Richard Hershey
Defendant / Appellant: Dr. John Jasinski, President of Northwest Missouri State University, in his official capacity, Dr. Pat Harr, Member of the Board of Regents of Northwest Missouri State University, in his official capacity, Dr. Marilou Joyner, Member of the Board of Regents of Northwest Missouri State University, in her official capacity and others
Defendant: Dr. Jay Johnson, Interim Director of Northwest Missouri State University, Kansas City Campus, in his official capacity
Richard Hershey v. Dr. John Jasinski, et al
as 22-1941
Plaintiff / Appellant: Richard Hershey
Defendant / Appellee: Dr. John Jasinski, President of Northwest Missouri State University, in his official capacity, Dr. Pat Harr, Member of the Board of Regents of Northwest Missouri State University, in his official capacity, Dr. Marilou Joyner, Member of the Board of Regents of Northwest Missouri State University, in her official capacity and others
Defendant: Dr. Jay Johnson, Interim Director of Northwest Missouri State University, Kansas City Campus, in his official capacity
Richard Hershey v. Dr. John Jasinski, et al
as 22-1826
Plaintiff / Appellee: Richard Hershey
Defendant / Appellant: Dr. John Jasinski, President of Northwest Missouri State University, in his official capacity, Dr. Pat Harr, Member of the Board of Regents of Northwest Missouri State University, in his official capacity, Dr. Marilou Joyner, Member of the Board of Regents of Northwest Missouri State University, in her official capacity and others
Defendant: Dr. Jay Johnson, Interim Director of Northwest Missouri State University, Kansas City Campus, in his official capacity
Bhattacharya v. Southeast Missouri State University Board of Regents et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00043
Plaintiff: Dr. Shamik Bhattacharya
Defendant: Southeast Missouri State University Board of Regents, Dr. Carlos Vargas, Dr. Mike Godard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?