Cases 1 - 10 of 245
Middleton v. Reyes et al
as 2:2024cv00753
Plaintiff:
Evan Middleton
Defendant:
Erin Reyes, C. Dieter, Mike Reese and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Su v. LBB Progress Ridge, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00736
Plaintiff:
Julie A. Su
Defendant:
LBB Progress Ridge, LLC, Amergent Hospitality Group Inc., Fred Glick and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938
Oravetz v. Oravetz
as 6:2024cv00415
Plaintiff:
Mark Oravetz
Defendant:
Mike Oravetz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McCrary v. Kotek et al
as 3:2024cv00401
Plaintiff:
Dathan Jude McCrary, Sr
Defendant:
Tina Kotek, Ellen F. Rosenblum, Mike Schmidt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reed v. Eugene School District 4J et al
as 6:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Reed
Defendant:
Eugene School District 4J, Paula McCown, Jonathan Andrew Dey, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap)
J.B. v. Gray et al
as 3:2023cv01962
Plaintiff:
J.B.
Defendant:
Levi Gray, Jayson Leak, Paul Kizer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01871
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12111 Americans With Disabilities Act
Parkerson v. O.D.O.C. et al
as 2:2023cv01865
Plaintiff:
William J. Parkerson
Defendant:
O.D.O.C., Whelan, C. Bauer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Yarn v. Bogen et al
as 3:2023cv01771
Plaintiff:
Donnie Yard and Donnie Yarn
Defendant:
Ethan Bogen, Marc Rodriguez, Carey Caldwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sat v. Schmite et al
as 3:2023cv01546
Plaintiff:
Khalid Caldwell Sat
Defendant:
Mike Schmite, Nikolas Matiatos and Marisa Fonseca
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
