Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Harris v. McSwain et al
as 2:2010cv04146
Plaintiff:
Jim Harris, Jr
Defendant:
Ellis McSwain and Mo. Dept. of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cregg Matthews v. Dr. Karl Saffo, et al
as 10-1582
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Cregg L. Matthews
Defendant:
MO Dept. of Corrections, Western Missouri Correctional Center, CMS Medical Service and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Dr. Karl Saffo and Joy Hailey
Wahid v. Mo Dept of Corrections
as 4:2009cv00697
Petitioner:
Hakim M. Wahid
Respondent:
Mo Dept of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shive v. Mo Dept. of Corrections
as 4:2009cv00023
Plaintiff:
Merle Shive
Defendant:
Mo Dept. of Corrections
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv00007
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Cole v. Mo Dept. of Corrections
as 4:2008cv00825
Petitioner:
De'Shonna L. Cole
Respondent:
Mo Dept. of Corrections
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Conley v. Mo Dept. of Corrections et al
as 5:2008cv06112
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Conley
Defendant:
Mo Dept. of Corrections, Roger L. Bennett, Jean Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Matthews v. Mo Dept. of Corrections et al
as 5:2008cv06099
Plaintiff:
Cregg L. Matthews
Defendant:
Mo Dept. of Corrections, Western Missouri Correctional Center, CMS Medical Service and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Clark v. Mo Dept. of Corrections et al
as 2:2008cv04208
Plaintiff:
Louis G. Clark
Defendant:
Mo Dept. of Corrections, Dave Dormire, Valerie Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Campbell v. Mo Dept. of Corrections
as 4:2007cv00764
Petitioner:
Gary R. Campbell
Respondent:
Mo Dept. of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
