Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv06714
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Rahman et al v. July 96 Corp. et al
as 1:2021cv09649
Plaintiff:
Mohammad Rahman and Jose Vargas
Defendant:
July 96 Corp., Melitios Meletiou and Fanis Tsiamtsiouris
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Castro et al v. Hyper Structure Corp. et al
as 1:2021cv01391
Plaintiff:
Mario Del Valle Martinez and Maria Castro
Defendant:
Charles Toliver, Mohammad Rahman, Hyper Structure Corp. doing business as Hyper Structure and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Sanchez et al v. Hyper Structure Corp. et al
as 1:2019cv04524
Plaintiff:
Miguel Angel Vasquez Baca, Banny Ramos, Oscar Martinez and others
Defendant:
Hyper Structure Corp., Mohammad Rahman and Willie Trescly
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Cruz v. United States of America et al
as 1:2019cv02064
Defendant:
Ozone Park Medical Care, PLLC, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Mohammad Rahman and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Cruz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
WOMACK et al v. RAHMAN et al
as 2:2017cv04154
Plaintiff:
KATHRYN WOMACK and RICK MEYERS
Defendant:
MOHAMMAD RAHMAN and WAHEE GURU TRANS LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv04640
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Mohammad Rahman v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 14-72622
Petitioner:
MOHAMMAD RAHMAN
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Chanel, Inc. v. Rahman et al
as 4:2010cv01361
Plaintiff:
Chanel, Inc.
Defendant:
Ziyad Mohammad Rahman, Does 1-10 and Ingrid Murray Rahman
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Shajan et al v. Barolo, Ltd. et al
as 1:2010cv01385
Plaintiff:
Mohammad Shajan, Mohammad Shajan, Mohammad Shajan and others
Defendant:
Barolo, Ltd. and Paolo Secondo
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
