Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02508
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022at00979
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01596
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022at00045
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00087
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv07864
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Moore et al v. Esurance Insurance Company et al
as 3:2021cv00976
Defendant:
Sprint/T Mobile, SSM Health, Twitter/Fox Business-Rocknation and others
Plaintiff:
Random Pages LC/LLC doing business as Dark Skin Barbee Ann, Random and Infinitive Pages LC/LLC doing business as Bee Unscipted/Anonymous Beauty, Barbara Ann Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv
3-H Market et al v. United States of America
as 1:2021cv00542
Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
Ali Mohamed Nasser, 3-H Market and Latifa Nagi Hamood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
3-H Market et al v. United States of America
as 1:2021at00364
Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
Ali Mohamed Nasser, 3-H Market and Latifa Nagi Hamood
Nasser V. Social Security, Commissioner of
as 1:2020cv11752
Not Yet Classified:
Mr. Ronald Glotta
Plaintiff:
Mohammed Nasser
Defendant:
Social Security Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
