Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Sundari Prasad v. Hamilton Hendrix, et al
as 20-7069
Defendant / Appellee:
Hamilton L. Hendrix, Dana Parton, "Masumi Max", Monica K. Vick Hendrix and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Sundari K. Prasad, also known as Sun Karma
PRASAD v. STYLE WEEKLY MAGAZINE et al
as 1:2018cv01309
Plaintiff:
SUNDARI K. PRASAD
Defendant:
STYLE WEEKLY MAGAZINE, JASON ROOP, MELISSA SCOTT SINCLAIR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PRASAD v. DELTA SIGMA THETA SORORITY, INC. et al
as 1:2018cv01130
Plaintiff:
SUNDARI KARMA PRASAD
Defendant:
DELTA SIGMA THETA SORORITY, INC., BEVERLY EVANS SMITH, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sundari Prasad v. Hamilton Hendrix
as 17-7483
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SUNDARI K. PRASAD
Defendant - Appellee:
HAMILTON L. HENDRIX, GLORIA DALE LEWIS-SORRELL, JAMES SORRELL and others
Prasad v. Mi Boca Latina et al
as 3:2017cv00497
Plaintiff:
Sundari K. Prasad
Defendant:
Mi Boca Latina, Donald Agegunwa, Hamilton L. Hendrix and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prasad v. The Aquarian Bookshop et al
as 3:2017cv00139
Plaintiff:
Sundari K. Prasad
Defendant:
The Aquarian Bookshop, The Alchemists, Divine Magic and Novelties and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prasad v. U.S. Dept. of Agriculture et al
as 3:2017cv00138
Plaintiff:
Sundari K. Prasad
Defendant:
U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Monica K. Vick and Hamilton L. Hendrix
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prasad v. Hendrix et al
as 3:2017cv00040
Plaintiff:
Sundari K. Prasad
Defendant:
Hamilton L. Hendrix, Gloria D. Lewis-Sorrell, James Sorrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prasad v. Norris et al
as 3:2017cv00006
Plaintiff:
Sundari K. Prasad
Defendant:
Sandra C. Norris, Remki Banerjee, Sgt. McCabe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sundari K. Prasad v. Monica Vick
as 16-7725
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SUNDARI K. PRASAD
Defendant - Appellee:
MONICA K. VICK, Drug Addict, HAMILTON L. HENDRIX, GLORIA DALE LEWIS-SORRELL and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
