Cases 11 - 20 of 32
Gaines v. Hines et al (INMATE 1)
as 7:2020cv00133
Defendant:
C.O. Cutts, Jr., Officer Anes, C.O. Cutts, Sr. and others
Plaintiff:
Phillip J. Gaines
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gaines v. Hines et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2019cv01045
Defendant:
C.O. Cutts, Jr., Officer Anes, C.O. Cutts, Sr. and others
Plaintiff:
Phillip J. Gaines
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
George v. Toney et al
as 4:2019cv00589
Defendant:
John Hutton, Finch, Charles Monk and others
Plaintiff:
Vernon Kendrick George
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Parker et al
as 7:2018cv01300
Defendant:
Monk, E Hynes and Jameson Parker
Plaintiff:
Sheyenne Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Sealey et al
as 7:2017cv01024
Plaintiff:
Terry Lee Anderson
Defendant:
James Q Sealey, Neicko L White, Sgt Monk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rossman v. Monk et al
as 2:2017cv00986
Plaintiff:
Brud Rossman
Defendant:
Sam Monk, John Beehler, Brian McLeigh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bagley v. Monk et al
as 1:2016cv00519
Petitioner:
James Edward Bagley
Defendant:
Judge Samuel Monk, Randy Moeller, James Henderson and others
Respondent:
Gary Williams and Attorney General of the State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00137
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cathey v. Curry et al
as 2:2012cv04115
Plaintiff:
Daveon Lamarnce Cathey
Defendant:
Chris Curry, Monk, Patrick Eugene and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Montgomery v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE1)
as 2:2011cv00757
Plaintiff:
Marshall Montgomery
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Kim Tobias Thomas, J. C. Giles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
