Cases filed in Virginia
Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Jones v. The Crestar Bank Employees et al
as 1:2010cv00172
Plaintiff: Benjamin H. Jones
Defendant: The Crestar Bank Employees, A. Curtis Monk, Marilyn Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Farrakhan v. Johnson et al
as 7:2009cv00233
Plaintiff: Shaka Amir Farrakhan
Defendant: Gene Johnson, Eric Madsen, Duncan Mills and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv00073
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Type: Civil Rights None
Farrakhan v. Johnson et al
as 1:2009cv00178
Plaintiff: Shaka Amir Farrakhan
Defendant: Gene Johnson, Eric Madsen, Duncan Mills and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Monk v. Astrue
as 2:2007cv00058
Plaintiff: Kathy L. Monk
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Monk v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2007mc00012
Plaintiff: Kathy L. Monk
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Podhorn v. Angelini et al
as 3:2007cv00416
Plaintiff: Paul E. Podhorn, Jr.
Defendant: Chris Angelini, Scott Finley, B. True and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question Bivens-Prisoner
Renoir v. Brown et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2007cv00166
Plaintiff: Pierre A. Renoir
Defendant: Lt. Brown, Greer, Sgt. Hamilton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2007cv00020
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Monk v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2007cv00003
Plaintiff: Brenda K. Monk
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?