Cases filed in New York
Cases 21 - 30 of 37
Monk et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2012cv02933
Defendant: John Aconi, City of New York, Department of Juvenile Justice and others
Plaintiff: Kecia Monk and Larissa Royster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gonzalez v. Hairy Monk, Corp. et al
as 1:2012cv04196
Plaintiff: Pablo Gonzalez
Defendant: Hairy Monk, Corp. and John Cavanagh
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv00538
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Morales v. Hairy Monk Corp. et al
as 1:2012cv02091
Plaintiff: Juan Carlos Morales
Defendant: Hairy Monk Corp., John Hayes and John Cavanagh
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Monk et al v. Labelle
as 1:2011cv09258
Plaintiff: Kevin Monk and Roseanna Monk
Defendant: Patti Labelle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Martinez et al v. Hairy Monk, Corp. et al
as 1:2011cv07842
Plaintiff: Jose Luis Martinez
Defendant: Hairy Monk, Corp. and John Cavanagh
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Goddard v. Martino et al
as 7:2011cv06328
Plaintiff: Donald J. Goddard
Defendant: Thomas J. Martino, Michael S. Taylor, James W. Monks, Sr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Valentin Garcia v. Hairy Monk, Corp. et al
as 1:2011cv00842
Plaintiff: Heradio Valentin Garcia
Defendant: Hairy Monk, Corp. , John Hayes and John Cavanagh
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Carriere et al v. Bradley et al
as 7:2010cv05044
Plaintiff: Joseph Carrier , Duncan MacRae , Edward Monk and others
Defendant: Adam Bradley , Thomas M. Roach , Benjamin Boykin, II and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Triplett v. Rendle et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 9:2009cv01396
Plaintiff: Omar Triplett
Defendant: Sgt. Rendle, R. Myers, D. Barriere and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?