Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00588
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00589
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Humphreys v. Securus Phone et al
as 4:2023cv05171
Plaintiff:
Scott W Humphreys
Defendant:
Securus Phone, More, A More and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Humphreys v. Securus Phone et al
as 3:2023cv06120
Plaintiff:
Scott Wesley Humphreys
Defendant:
Securus Phone, More, A More and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01737
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
United States of America v. Dieringer et al
as 2:2022cv00111
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
102.38 Acres of Land More or Less Situate in Grant County State of Washington, Jeff T Dieringer, Lynn M Dieringer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358 Land Condemnation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00808
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112
Wilson v. Spokane County et al
as 2:2019cv00405
Defendant:
Spokane County, Officer White, Officer Gray and others
Plaintiff:
Ardis Lavelle Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
More v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2019cv05690
Plaintiff:
Steve R More
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
North Sails Group LLC v. Boards & More GmbH et al
as 1:2019cv03112
Defendant:
Boards & More Inc and Boards & More GmbH
Plaintiff:
North Sails Group LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
