Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 97
Gold v. US Bancorp et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv01342
Plaintiff: Michelle Gold, The Gold Family Trust, Star Martinez and others
Defendant: J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, RBS Acceptance Inc., RBS Financial Prodcuts Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Civil Remedies: Racketeering (RICO) Act
In re: Washington Mutual Inc, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-1725
Debtor: In re: WMI INVESTMENT CORP and WASHINGTON MUTUAL INC
Defendant / Appellee: MORGAN STANLEY & CO INC, CREDIT SUISSE SECURITIES USA, WMI LIQUIDATING TRUST and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: ALICE GRIFFIN
In Re: Morgan Stanley
as 16-8036
Plaintiff - Petitioner: NICK PONTILENA, JIMMY KUHN, HOWARD ROSENBLATT and others
Defendant - Respondent: MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY LLC and MORGAN STANLEY & CO INC
Delaware Trust Company v. Wilmington Trust, N.A.
as 1:2015cv00657
Plaintiff: Delaware Trust Company and Delaware Trust Company, as First Lien Indenture Trustee
Defendant: Wilmington Trust, N.A. , The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. and Wilmington Trust, N.A., as First Lien Collateral Agent
Intervenor_defendant: J Aron & Company , Titan Indemnity Company and Morgan Stanley & Co. Inc.
Intervenor: Titan Investment Holdings LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Delaware Trust Company v. Wilmington Trust, N.A.
as 1:2015cv00657
Plaintiff: Delaware Trust Company
Defendant: Wilmington Trust, N.A. and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A.
Intervenor_defendant: J Aron & Company, Titan Indemnity Company and Morgan Stanley & Co. Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Verble v. Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, LLC et al (TV3) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2015cv00074
Plaintiff: John S. Verble
Defendant: Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, LLC and Morgan Stanley & Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
David Luther, et al v. Countrywide Financial Corporat, et al
as 14-55121
Plaintiff - Appellee: DAVID H. LUTHER, individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Sisutated, VERMONT PENSION INVESTMENT COMMITTEE, MASHREQBANK P S C and others
Objector - Appellant: FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, as Receiver for First Pacific Bank of California, as Receiver for Affinity Bank, as Receiver for CF Bancorp, as Receiver for Citizens National Bank, as Receiver for Eurobank, as Receiver for First Banking Center, as
Defendant - Appellee: COUNTRYWIDE FINANCIAL CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS INC., CWALT, INC., a Delaware corporation and others
Western Conference v. Countrywide Financial Corp., et al
as 14-55120
Plaintiff - Appellee: WESTERN CONFERENCE OF TEAMSTERS PENSION TRUST FUND
Objector - Appellant: FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, as Receiver for First Pacific Bank of California, as Receiver for Affinity Bank, as Receiver for CF Bancorp, as Receiver for Citizens National Bank, as Receiver for Eurobank, as Receiver for First Banking Center, as
Defendant - Appellee: COUNTRYWIDE FINANCIAL CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS INC., CWALT, INC., a Delaware corporation and others
Western Conference v. Countrywide Financial Corp., et al
as 14-55122
Plaintiff - Appellee: WESTERN CONFERENCE OF TEAMSTERS PENSION TRUST FUND
Objector - Appellant: BRODERICK CDO 2 LTD., CIMARRON CDO, LTD., CRYSTAL COVE CDO, LTD. and others
Defendant - Appellee: COUNTRYWIDE FINANCIAL CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS INC., CWALT, INC., a Delaware corporation and others
Dr. Marshall J Orloff IRA R/O, et al v. Schering Plough Corp, et al
as 13-4328
Plaintiff - Appellant: DR. MARSHALL J ORLOFF and ORLOFF FAMILY TRUST DTD 12/13/01
Plaintiff - Appellee: ARKANSAS TEACHER RETIREMENT SYSTEM, PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF MISSISSIPPI, LOUISIANA MUNICIPAL POLICE EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM and others
Defendant - Appellee: SCHERING PLOUGH CORP, FRED HASSAN, ROBERT J. BERTOLINI and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?