Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Morris v. Bureau of Prisons, United States of America et al
as 1:2022fp00275
Defendant:
FCI Berlin, Bureau of Prisons, United States of America, USA and others
Plaintiff:
Robert C. Morris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morris v. FCI Berlin, Warden
as 1:2022fp00124
Petitioner:
James Morris
Respondent:
FCI Berlin, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Fernandes v. Bouley et al
as 1:2020cv11612
Defendant:
Edward Bouley, Bristol County Sheriff's Office, Steven J. Souza and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Fernandes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alford v. Steven et al
as 1:2018cv12395
Defendant:
Margaret Carter, Brade Steven and Daniel Hohler
Plaintiff:
Rickey Alford and Morris Day
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alford v. Boston Celtic Club et al
as 1:2018cv12376
Defendant:
Boston Celtic Club and Brad Stevens
Plaintiff:
Rickey Alford and Morris Day
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Demos et al
as 1:2018cv12322
Defendant:
Massachusetts State Police, George Demos, Margaret Morris and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Edward Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Montrond v. Spencer et al
as 1:2017cv10505
Plaintiff:
Amaral Montrond
Defendant:
Luis Spencer, Thomas Turco, III, Michael Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morris v. USA
as 1:2016cv12349
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Ryan Morris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Burnham v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts et al
as 4:2016cv40156
Plaintiff:
Arthur A Burnham
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Maura Healey, Dennis P McManus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stote, et al v. Umass Correctional Health Care, et al
as 14-1827
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN E. STOTE
:
JAMES CYR and JOSE SIME
Plaintiff:
WAYNE D. CROSBY, TERRY CARTER, ENEZ KOLENVOVIC and others
Defendant - Appellee:
UMASS CORRECTIONAL HEALTHCARE, UMASS MEDICAL SCHOOL, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
