Cases 21 - 30 of 397
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03729
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00153
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
BARNETT v. CITY OF WARWICK, GEORGIA et al
as 1:2023cv00131
Plaintiff:
ALICE LANELLE BARNETT
Defendant:
CITY OF WARWICK GEORGIA, APRIL MORRIS and THOMAS STEWART
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GRANTHAM v. CITY OF WARWICK GEORGIA et al
as 1:2023cv00132
Plaintiff:
KAYLA RAYNE GRANTHAM
Defendant:
CITY OF WARWICK GEORGIA, APRIL MORRIS and THOMAS STEWART
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
HARRIS et al v. DESANTIS et al
as 4:2023cv00328
Plaintiff:
LAKEISHA HARRIS, MANUEL D CHAVOUS, YOLANDA S BAKER and others
Defendant:
RONALD D DESANTIS, JOSEPH A LADAPO, MICHELE TALLENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Marvin O'Neal Morris Bey Living Trust v. Smith
as 3:2023cv00943
Plaintiff:
Marvin O'Neal Morris Bey and Marvin O'Neal Morris Bey Living Trust
Defendant:
Judge Chad Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02843
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
ROBINSON v. YOUNG
as 4:2023cv00243
Plaintiff:
JESSICA KEANNA ROBINSON
Defendant:
MORRIS A. YOUNG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chisholm v. Diversicare, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00638
Plaintiff:
Lewis F Chisholm
Defendant:
Diversicare, Inc., Hoover Police Department, June Morris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02244
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
