Cases 21 - 30 of 139
Morris v. Heuerman et al
as 2:2020cv02114
Defendant:
Shane Cook, Dustin Heuerman, Karee Voges and others
Plaintiff:
Jabari M Morris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morris v. Scott et al
as 4:2020cv04092
Defendant:
Shan Jumper, Eric Kunkel, Michael Kerr and others
Plaintiff:
Chadd Morris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Malloy v. JUUL Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv03245
Defendant:
JUUL Labs, Inc., PAX Labs, Inc., Phillip Morris USA, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Mr. Landen Malloy and Landen Malloy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Morris v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2019cv02273
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
CSS-Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
John Robert Morris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Wiles et al v. Morris Material Handling, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv01218
Plaintiff:
Li Wiles and Kyle Wiles
Defendant:
Schneider Electric USA, Inc. and Morris Material Handling, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Morris v. Cook County Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2019cv01157
Defendant:
Cook County Department of Corrections, V Carter, S Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Morris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morris v. Smock et al
as 4:2019cv04089
Defendant:
Dr Shan Jumper, Gregg Scott, S Walace and others
Plaintiff:
Chadd Morris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Amalgamated Transit Union National 401(K) Pension Plan et al v Maruti Transit Group LLC et al
as 3:2019cv03060
Defendant:
MARUTI TRANSIT GROUP LLC and MARUTI FLEET & MGMT LLC
Plaintiff:
THOMAS SECREST, OSCAR OWENS, AMALGAMATED TRANSIT UNION NATIONAL 401(K) PENSION PLAN and its Trustees: and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Armstrong v. Watkins et al
as 1:2019cv01030
Defendant:
Matthew Ray, Jacob Beck, Daniel Duncan and others
Plaintiff:
Charles A. Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Kallis
as 1:2018cv01415
Respondent:
Steve Kallis
Petitioner:
Daniel Morris Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
