Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Al-Haqq v. Willingham et al
as 2:2021cv04139
Plaintiff:
Bilal A. Al-Haqq
Defendant:
Eyvonne Willingham, Elaine Freeman, South Carolina Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis v. Stirling et al
as 2:2020cv00097
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections, Candi Cannon, Ms. Chi and others
Plaintiff:
Derrick Timothy Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dizzley v. Pate et al
as 8:2019cv02665
Defendant:
Ms Brown, Officer Brown, Off Martin and others
Plaintiff:
Terron Gerhard Dizzley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cabbagestalk v. Stirling et al
as 5:2017cv02703
Plaintiff:
Shaheen Cabbagestalk
Defendant:
Bryan P Stirling, Cpt Carter, L Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Al-Haqq v. Stirling et al
as 2:2014cv00098
Plaintiff:
Bilal A Al-Haqq
Defendant:
Byran P Stirling, John Pate, McKendly Newton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simmons v. Haley et al
as 5:2013cv01950
Plaintiff:
Darren S Simmons
Defendant:
Nikki R Haley, William R Byars, Jr, Thomas E Byrne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Johnson v. Haley et al
as 2:2012cv00507
Plaintiff:
Ronald Colonial Johnson
Defendant:
Nikki Haley, Mark Sanford, Jon Ozmint and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rochester v. DeGeorgis et al
as 6:2011cv03221
Plaintiff:
Julian E Rochester
Defendant:
B DeGeorgis, C/O Garrison, D M McCall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rochester v. DeGeorgis et al
as 8:2011cv03221
Plaintiff:
Julian E Rochester
Defendant:
B DeGeorgis, C/O Garrison, D M McCall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cabbagestalk v. Bostic et al
as 3:2008cv00063
Plaintiff:
Shaheen Cabbagestalk
Defendant:
Dwan Bostic, Kitchen Supervisor Reeves, Marlboro County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
