Cases 1 - 10 of 33
HUDSON v. HARRY et al
as 3:2026cv00239
Plaintiff:
Kendall Hudson
Defendant:
Laurel Harry, Bernadette Mason, Lt. Eyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HUDSON v. HARRY et al
as 2:2026cv00580
Plaintiff:
KENDALL HUDSON
Defendant:
LAUREL HARRY, BERNADETTE MASON, EYER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Troy Lewald v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, et al
as 25-2166
Plaintiff:
TROY LEWALD
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GEORGE M. LITTLE, KERI MOORE and others
HEAGY v. TERRA et al
as 2:2025cv02672
Plaintiff:
TYLER T. HEAGY
Defendant:
J. TERRA, C. HENSLEY, JOHN MUICK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hennessy v. Mason et al
as 3:2025cv00752
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Hennessy
Defendant:
Bernadette Mason, Jeanne Kanjorski, Christina Houser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ZAMICHIELI v. GARNETT et al
as 2:2025cv01202
Plaintiff:
LAMONT ZAMICHIELI
Defendant:
C/O DAV. GARNETT, C/O ISABEL MEDINA, UM SEAN GRADY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JACKSON v. EASON et al
as 2:2025cv01148
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM JACKSON
Defendant:
SGT. EASON, CO. ROB, CO. ROUSE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SCOTT v. AGULERI et al
as 2:2024cv06077
Defendant:
MR. SMITH, MR. DAGGER, LT. MR. AGULERI and others
Plaintiff:
OBATAIYE K. SCOTT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TEAGLE v. DOC DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION'S et al
as 2:2024cv05544
Defendant:
CO RICK, CO SHORTER, CO CLAUSEN and others
Plaintiff:
KYLEAF TEAGLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. PA Dept. of Corrections et al
as 3:2024cv01393
Defendant:
Sgt. Stephany, Bower, Lieutenant Emmel and others
Plaintiff:
Faquan Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
