Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Druhan v. ABC et al
as 1:2024cv11306
Plaintiff:
Robert Druhan
Defendant:
ABC and ABC Nightly News with David Muir
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Peden v. Democratic National Committee et al
as 1:2021cv10360
Defendant:
Seema Nanda, Andrew Lacombe, Paula Kerger and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Peden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Peden v. Democratic National Committee et al
as 1:2020cv11019
Defendant:
Paula Kerger, Cesar Conde, Jennifer Suozzo and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Peden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv10563
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Higgins v. City of Melrose et al
as 1:2018cv12605
Defendant:
Stephen Long Muir, Stephen's Auto Body and Towing Service, City of Melrose and others
Plaintiff:
John T. Higgins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Deng et al v. ReWalk Robotics Ltd. et al
as 1:2017cv10169
Defendant:
ReWalk Robotics Ltd., Larry Jasinski, Ami Kraft and others
Plaintiff:
Qian Deng , David Hershlikovitz , Jackie888, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Bona v. Berkshire Hills Regional School District et al
as 3:2016cv30104
Plaintiff:
Maggie Bona
Defendant:
Berkshire Hills Regional School District, Scott Muir, Donna Moyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv10563
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Garrity, Levin and Muir llp v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 1:2015cv11405
Plaintiff:
Garrity, Levin and Muir llp
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service, Paul Dillon and Sharon Dillon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Muir v. Stockbridge, Town of et al
as 3:2014cv30092
Plaintiff:
Scott Muir
Defendant:
Stockbridge, Town of and Stephen Shatz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
