Cases 1 - 10 of 155
Piard v. Murphy
as 4:2024cv40005
Plaintiff:
Joseph Piard
Defendant:
Carolyn Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Graulau et al v. Turco et al
as 1:2023cv10129
Plaintiff:
Luis Graulau and Jose Collazo
Defendant:
Secretary Thomas Turco, Carol Mici, Paul Henderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WHALEN v. USA
as 1:2022cv00413
Petitioner:
ARCHIE MURPHY WHALEN
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Smith v. Currie et al
as 1:2022cv11321
Plaintiff:
Steven L Smith
Defendant:
Haley Currie, Dennis P McManus, Robert J. Creedon, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lech v. Von Goeler, et al
as 22-1507
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LIDIA LECH
Defendant / Appellee:
DOROTHEA VON GOELER, BAYSTATE MEDICAL PRACTICES, INC., HAMPDEN COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and others
Defendant:
JOHN DOE 1 and JOHN DOE 2
Murphy v. Strafford County Department of Corrections, et al
as 22-1325
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHAWN MURPHY
Defendant / Appellee:
STRAFFORD COUNTY HOUSE OF CORRECTION, LEONARD NADEAU, Sergeant, DONNA ROY, Lieutenant and others
Defendant:
NH DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, WILLIAM L. WRENN, MICHAEL A. ZENK, Warden and others
Norris v. Moroney et al
as 1:2022cv10660
Plaintiff:
Kevin Norris
Defendant:
GloriaAnn Moroney, Kevin Devlin, Frederick Russell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MURPHY v. BOLDUC CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 1:2022cv00116
Plaintiff:
PATRICK M MURPHY
Defendant:
BOLDUC CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, DANA LNU and PATTI LNU
Not Classified By Court:
MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - PRISONER CASES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MURPHY v. BOBROW et al
as 1:2022cv00115
Plaintiff:
PATRICK M MURPHY
Defendant:
DAVID J BOBROW and BRENDAN O'BRIEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
