Cases 21 - 30 of 257
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv01234
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jaye v. United States et al (MAG +)
as 2:2022cv00376
Plaintiff:
Chris Jaye
Defendant:
United States, Merrick B. Garland, John G. Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Watson v. Dunn et al
as 2:2022cv00324
Plaintiff:
Clara Watson
Defendant:
Jefferson Dunn, Edward Ellington, Cynthia McCovery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chambers v. Laurel Murphy Real Estate, LLC
as 3:2022cv00520
Plaintiff:
Delroy A. Chambers, Jr.
Defendant:
Laurel Murphy Real Estate, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00603
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 ad - Americans with Disabilities Act
Debra Curry v. Clayton County Police Department, et al
as 22-11202
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEBRA DENISE CURRY
Defendant / Appellee:
CLAYTON COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT, TERRY BASKIN, CLAYTON TAX COMMISSIONERS OFFICE and others
Willette v. Murphy et al
as 5:2022cv00138
Plaintiff:
Paul Michael Willette
Defendant:
Vincent Murphy, Paul Millitello, Judiciary Courts of the State of Florida and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jonathan Hall v. Jason Smoak, et al
as 22-10345
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JONATHAN HALL
Defendant / Appellee:
JASON SMOAK, JAMES BRAZIER, MARK TRAWICK, Sgt. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00039
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Murphy v. State of Alabama et al
as 1:2022cv00018
Plaintiff:
Rodney J. Murphy
Defendant:
State Of Alabama, Vincent Deas and Marengo County DHR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
