Cases 1 - 10 of 153
(PC) Petillo v. Lynch et al
as 2:2024cv00421
Plaintiff:
Dennis Petillo, Jr.
Defendant:
Jeff Lynch, Endy, Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Tate v. Calamia et al
as 2:2023cv01637
Plaintiff:
Derek Tate
Defendant:
Tiara Calamia, Joshua Robinson, E. Best and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Myers v. Posson et al
as 3:2023cv01682
Plaintiff:
Christopher W Myers
Defendant:
Doctor S. Posson and Doctor E. Bridgnell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(HC) Myers v. Phillips et al
as 1:2023cv00409
Petitioner:
Anthony James Myers
Respondent:
Bryan D. Phillips and Jeff Macomber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC)Williamson v. Stewart et al
as 2:2022cv02169
Plaintiff:
Alvin Williamson and Alvin Williamson, Jr
Defendant:
D. Stewart, C. Yang, J. Avila and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Myers
as 4:2022cv07364
Plaintiff:
Armand A. Jackson
Defendant:
Mark Myers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Myers
as 3:2022cv07362
Petitioner:
Armand A. Jackson
Respondent:
Mark Myers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Davis-Murry v. Contra Costa Health Services et al
as 3:2022cv04349
Plaintiff:
Blake Christopher Davis-Murry
Defendant:
Contra Costa Health Services, Contra Costa Sheriffs Department, Brian Holoyda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv03671
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Myers v. Clayton et al
as 3:2022cv00673
Plaintiff:
Raymond Dean Myers
Defendant:
David Clayton, E. Brillo, R. Buckel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
