Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Lenze v. Swaney
as 6:2023cv00060
Petitioner:
Andrew Myles Lenze
Respondent:
G. Swaney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Minor v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.
as 1:2022cv00092
Plaintiff:
Myles Minor
Defendant:
Greyhound Lines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 mv Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle
Lenze v. Gilley
as 6:2021cv00115
Petitioner:
Andrew Myles Lenze
Respondent:
J. Gilley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Walker v. Louisville/Jefferson County Metro Government et al
as 3:2021cv00161
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Walker, III
Defendant:
Sgt. Luke Phan, Major Kimberly Burbrink, Lt. Shawn Hoover and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Napper et al v. Hankison et al
as 3:2020cv00764
Plaintiff:
Chelsey Napper and Cody Etherton
Defendant:
LT. Shawn Hoover, Detective Jonathan Mattingly, LT. Jerry Huckleberry and others
Interested Party:
Brandon Jerrard Lawrence
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00172
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 er
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00699
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Aaron et al v. Eli Lilly and Company et al
as 2:2011cv00354
Plaintiff:
Jim W. Aaron, Jr. , Jimmie D. Adams , Teena Adams and others
Defendant:
Eli Lilly and Company , AAIPharma, Inc., AAIPharma LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Childress v. Hawk
as 4:2011cv00045
Plaintiff:
Myles Childress
Defendant:
Pamela M. Hawk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Satterly et al v. Louisville-Jefferson County Metro County Government et al
as 3:2007cv00710
Plaintiff:
Arthur Satterly, Richard Mercado and Daniel Pagniozzi
Defendant:
Louisville-Jefferson County Metro County Government and Myles Cosgrove
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
