Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Myles v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01796
Plaintiff:
Kevin Myles
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Thompson v. Dezarn et al
as 1:2024cv00002
Plaintiff:
Anthony Thompson
Defendant:
Officer Nicholas R. Dezarn P0002 doing business as Cincinnati Police Department, Officer William P. Goetz P0100 doing business as Cincinnati Police Department, Officer Myles J. ABT P0076 doing business as Cincinnati Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gentzkow v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv04136
Plaintiff:
Myles Gentzkow, Jr.
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Myles v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv02458
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Venice Myles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Myles v. Gilmer Federal Correctional Institution
as 3:2020cv01092
Defendant:
Gilmer Federal Correctional Institution
Plaintiff:
Ronald R. Myles, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Zemtsov, M.D. v. UC Health, LLC et al
as 1:2020cv00100
Defendant:
University of Cincinnati Medical Center, LLC, Myles Pensak, M.D., UC Health, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Raquel Zemtsov, M.D.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dodson et al v. Sanofi S.A et al
as 2:2020cv00356
Plaintiff:
Thelma Myles, Antoine Dodson, Johnnyt Duyn and others
Defendant:
Sanofi US Services Inc, Sanofi-Aventis US LLC, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Myles v. United States of America
as 3:2020cv00133
Plaintiff:
Ronald R. Myles, Jr.
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Myles v. USA
as 3:2019cv02889
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Ronald R. Myles, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Kennedy v. CR Bard et al
as 2:2019cv04613
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and CR Bard
Plaintiff:
Myles Kennedy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
