Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Kyle Juelfs et al v. Northern Seed
as 4:2021cv00062
Defendant:
Northern Seed
Plaintiff:
Kyle Juelfs, Glenn MacDonald and Dave Juelfs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ford v. Michael et al
as 6:2018cv00060
Plaintiff:
Eugene Ford
Defendant:
Reginald Michael, Mike Batista, Mike Mahoney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tidyman's Management Services, Inc. et al v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA et al
as 9:2015cv00065
Plaintiff:
Tidyman's Management Services, Inc. , Lenora Davis Bateman , Vicki Earhart and others
Defendant:
National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Acord v. Astrue
as 4:2012cv00026
Plaintiff:
Roberta MacDonald Acord
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Riggs v. Crossroads Correctional Center, C.C.A. et al
as 4:2010cv00023
Plaintiff:
Robert D Riggs
Defendant:
Crossroads Correctional Center, C.C.A., Warden MacDonald, Assistant Warden Law and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McKeon v. Ferriter et al
as 4:2009cv00082
Plaintiff:
Christopher A McKeon
Defendant:
Mike Ferriter, Mike Mahoney, Elizabeth Rantz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McKeon v. Ferriter et al
as 9:2009cv00132
Plaintiff:
Christopher A McKeon
Defendant:
Mike Ferriter, Mike Mahoney, Elizabeth Rantz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Ferriter et al
as 9:2008cv00012
Petitioner:
Swan Smith
Respondent:
Mike Ferriter, Jim MacDonald and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ellenburg v. MacDonald et al
as 6:2008cv00027
Petitioner:
Michael Ellenburg
Respondent:
James MacDonald and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Maier v. Maurinac et al
as 6:2008cv00026
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Scott Maier
Defendant:
Marty Maurinac, Ross Swanson, Biggs and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
