Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00428
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Macias Aviles v. Stone
as 3:2022cv00126
Petitioner:
Angel Manuel Macias Aviles
Respondent:
Stacey N. Stone and Warden, FCI Yazoo Medium
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Macias v. Georgia Department of Juvenile Justice et al
as 1:2022cv03462
Plaintiff:
Jayro Macias
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Juvenile Justice, Rockdale Regional Youth Detention Center, Wayne Dashield and others
Superior Business Management, Inc. et al v. Macias Gini & O'Connell LLP et al
as 1:2022cv02861
Defendant:
Anthony Smalls, Macias Gini & O'Connell LLP doing business as MGO LLP, Danielle Berg and others
Plaintiff:
Superior Business Management, Inc., Superior Tax Solutions, LLC and Kris Benson
MACIAS v. UNNAMED RESPONDENT(S)
as 3:2020cv00083
Respondent:
UNNAMED RESPONDENT(S)
Petitioner:
ROSALINO SOLIS MACIAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Macias v. Unnamed Respondent(s)
as 1:2020cv03177
Respondent:
Unnamed Respondent(s)
Petitioner:
Rosalino Solis Macias
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Harpo v. Howard et al
as 1:2016cv03876
Plaintiff:
Wilhy Harpo
Defendant:
Burnice A. Howard, James H. Atkins, Cornelius Abraham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Villegas-Macias v. Stone
as 3:2015cv00068
Petitioner:
Jose Luis Villegas-Macias
Respondent:
Stacey N. Stone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014mi00122
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Sanchez et al v. Sansom et al
as 1:2014cv02279
Plaintiff:
Omar Moreno Sanchez , Maria Macias and Natalie Sanchez
Defendant:
Robert J. Sansom , ABCO Transportation, Inc. and Protective Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
