Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02244
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv01130
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Flemming et al v. Dayoub, et al
as 5:2022cv03066
Plaintiff:
Antonio B. Flemming, James Michael Poterbin, Kurt Kingsley and others
Defendant:
Charles A. Dayoub, United States Marshal Service, (fnu) Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Newton et al v. Hudson et al
as 5:2022cv03011
Plaintiff:
Andre Newton, Miguel Pizarro, Brian Pizarro and others
Defendant:
D. Hudson, Ol Aulepp, (fnu) Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Mack v. J.M. Smucker Company, The et al
as 5:2021cv04038
Plaintiff:
Cedric Mack
Defendant:
Focus Workforce Management, Inc., J.M. Smuckers and J. M. Smucker Company, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Speer (ID 96901) v. Beardsley et al
as 5:2020cv03075
Defendant:
(fnu) Barr, (fnu) Jiles, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Speer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Randall (ID 33680) v. Hutchinson Police Department et al
as 5:2018cv03245
Defendant:
Rick Roberts, Patricia Macke Dick, (fnu) Harcrow and others
Plaintiff:
Leroy Randall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv02391
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mack v. Kansas State Highway Patrol et al
as 5:2017cv03058
Plaintiff:
David Anthony Mack
Defendant:
Kansas State Highway Patrol, T. Gleason, Lisa Haymer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mack v. Regalado et al
as 5:2017cv03016
Plaintiff:
David Anthony Mack
Defendant:
(fnu) Regalado, (fnu) Anderson, (fnu) Floberg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
