Cases 21 - 30 of 86
THE SHERWIN-WILLIAMS COMPANY v. COUNTY OF DELAWARE, PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2018cv04517
Defendant:
MICHAEL CULP, BRAIN P. ZIDEK, JOHN DOES and others
Plaintiff:
THE SHERWIN-WILLIAMS COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALDEN THOMAS, SR. v. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION AND REHABILITATION, et al
as 2:2018mc00035
Plaintiff:
ALDEN A. THOMAS, SR.
Defendant:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION AND REHABILITATION and RAYMOND MADDEN
Cause Of Action: Motion for Order
Type:
Other Statutes
Rolle v. Madden
as 3:2017cv02333
Plaintiff:
Eric Steven Rolle
Defendant:
Hillary Madden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MADDEN v. CALIFORNIA UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2017cv01144
Plaintiff:
SEAN C. MADDEN
Defendant:
CALIFORNIA UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA , GERALDINE JONES and PENNSYLVANIA STATE SYSTEM OF HIGHER EDUCATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv02465
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bivens v. Commonwealth of PA et al
as 1:2017cv00809
Plaintiff:
Kimberly A. Bivens
Defendant:
Commonwealth of PA, County of Adams, Robert G. Bigham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MADDEN v. HILL
as 2:2017cv01438
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY A. MADDEN
Defendant:
NANCY BERRY HILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01279
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
MADDEN v. NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2016cv04231
Plaintiff:
KATE MADDEN
Defendant:
NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
WALTERS et al v. DELMONT BOROUGH POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2015cv00731
Plaintiff:
KRISTI WALTERS and GEORGE WALTERS
Defendant:
DELMONT BOROUGH POLICE DEPARTMENT and CHARLES MADDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
